Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Howard James's avatar

A powerful speech. We are up against the 'choice' paradigm when gender clinics offer these experiments to young adults, but if gender is socially constructed, gender 'choices' must also be socially constructed. Bodily autonomy is fictional if the available options are pre-ordained.

Our society has once again branded the control of homosexuals as a miracle cure. No other group in society is subject to this cruel and unusual punishment.

Expand full comment
Evelyn Ball, LMFT's avatar

Excellent, Maia, thank you for your courage, wisdom and passion. You are absolutely correct about adults needing to say “no,” and not accepting 18 as the age of consent for bodily harm.

Personally, I’m even struggling with 25 as an age of consent. As you state so passionately, it’s an ethical breach of the oath to “do no harm” by the medical profession as a whole, to offer sanctioned bodily harming “medical treatment” as a choice, at any age.

We also need to address the indoctrination occurring in early “education,” and create an educational system that teaches subjects in depth, not ideology, that is comfortable allowing kids to feel uncomfortable and stop steering them towards medicalizing as the way to deal with their human feelings, and that can train educators to manage behavior with authority so kids can be kids again, not coddled and not adulterized.

Additionally, we need to tackle the problem of the rewiring of childhood, and create spaces and opportunities for sensory-rich experiences for children in our neighborhoods and schools, so that the emotional distress epidemic can be turned around.

Lastly, we must meet kids’ current emotional and relational distress with compassion and understanding of the human/developmental needs that are going unmet due to societal flaws, not biological ones, so we can stop blaming kids’ individual bodies and brains, and start meeting their developmental needs.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts